The Agency's Posts

CONTAGION: Catch it ..: Achoos of Death Are Film’s Scourge BURBANK, Calif. — Earthquakes.Tornadoes. Debt....
Read More>

BECOMING A MARKETING SHARK!: Fall auditions are just around the corner... 1. Are you starting to feel frustrated as a....
Read More>

Broadway Scouts Go Online: Julia Tan, a 10-year-old actress who dreams of belting like Barbra, auditioned for her first....
Read More>

'Whisker Wars': Wild and Hairy: Welcome to the razor-free world of competitive beard-growing, with all its rivalries, cheering....
Read More>

Ryan Reynolds.: Is the bloom coming off the rose? Inasmuch as it’s ever hard being a Hollywood pinup,....
Read More>

Movie Review: 'The Change-Up': The body-switching comedy with Jason Bateman and Ryan Reynolds aims low. When the comedy....
Read More>

'Red Tails'.: Director talks George Lucas, delays, reshoots George Lucas had yearned for decades to tell....
Read More>

'RISE OF PLANET OF THE APES': If performing apes had a union, a picture of Andy Serkis would be pinned to the office....
Read More>

Lisa Kudrow has no issue playing against type: She portrays a vain and grating psychotherapist on 'Web Therapy' on Showtime. Lisa Kudrow, who....
Read More>

Is it possible to look cool in the heat of summer?: Sadly, no more than it is to look hot in the middle of a blizzard Over the winter you....
Read More>

Kristen Stewart:'Snow White and the Huntsmen': With Kristen Stewart in the driver's seat, one forthcoming depiction of Snow White has nary a....
Read More>

CAPTAIN AMERICA.: The comic-book movie has had, to say the least, an up-and-down year. But with the success of &qu
Read More>
Vanity Fair Editor Graydon Carter: Why I Spiked the Gwyneth Paltrow Article
Posted on: 02/20/14
Share/Save/Bookmark
 
Magazine chief takes 1,500 words to explain his decision on Gwyneth Paltrow story, saying he doesn't publish 'takedowns'

Graydon Carter, editor of Vanity Fair, has written an article in his magazine, running to more than 1,500 words, to tell readers why he has not published an article about Gwyneth Paltrow.

His editor's letter, which gets cover billing as "Goop, gossip & Gwyneth", is part explanation and part excuse for his spiking of a story he commissioned about the London-based film actor.

After his opening line, "Not to bore you with the details", he goes on to do just that. Well, up to a point. It also amounts to a revealing insight into the way in which a magazine that depends on celebrity content can be held hostage by celebrities.

In effect, after considerable pressure and months of dithering, Carter sounded the retreat.

The dispute began almost a year ago. Paltrow had been named by one US magazine, Star, as the "most hated celebrity" and named in another US magazine, People, as the "world's most beautiful woman."

These are not, as you will immediately gather, opposites. But the supposed contradiction was enough to stimulate a discussion at VF's editorial meeting, exposing a split between those who liked Paltrow and those who did not, and those who liked her website, Goop.com, and those who did not.

The result? Carter commissioned contributing editor Vanessa Grigoriadis to write "a reported essay on the Gwyneth Paltrow love/hate phenomenon."

Once Paltrow found out she emailed her show business friends saying: "Vanity Fair is threatening to put me on the cover of their magazine without my participation. I recommend you all never do this magazine again."

That message was duly reported in the New York Post and then the New York Times. According to Carter, he was soon inundated with emails from anti-Gwynethites threatening to cancel their subscriptions if the story didn't run and pro-Gwynethites who threatened to cancel their subscriptions if the story did run.

VF-versus-Paltrow had become a story before Grigoriadis filed her copy, which Carter describes as "delightfully written" but "not the one the anti-Gwynethites expected." Carter thought it "such a far cry from the almost mythical story that people were by now expecting – the 'epic takedown' filled with 'bombshell' revelations – that it was bound to be a disappointment."

So he sat on the article some more until, in October, Paltrow called him. "We talked for about 20 minutes about the story and her reaction, or over-reaction, to it," writes Carter.

He therefore continued to sit on the article. Inevitably, some two months later, news broke of a truce between him and Paltrow. And, of course, he was criticised, to use his phrase, "for caving." Here is his conclusion:

"The Gwyneth Paltrow saga had clearly just gotten away from us. My instinct was to continue to let it sit until people had forgotten about it, or at least until expectations had diminished.

The fact is the Gwyneth Paltrow story, the one we ordered up, as delightfully written as it was, is not the one the anti-Gwynethites expect. That it has generated more mail and attention than many of the biggest stories we've ever published only makes the situation more complicated.

The thing of it is, we really don't publish 'epic,' out-of-the-blue 'takedowns' of individual public figures, unless they are in heated conflict with another public figure or unless their positions and their actions have a grievous effect on the lives of others. We'll save our gunpowder for bigger stories.

And so, sorry as we are to disappoint all those many people out there, for the time being we'll leave it to another publication to roll out the 'epic bombshells' surrounding Gwyneth Paltrow. It's a story I might read. I just don't want to publish it."

But that doesn't make sense because he concedes that the "delightfully written" piece by Grigoriadis was "not the one the anti-Gwynethites expected." In other words, it wasn't a "takedown". So why not publish?

As for the "bigger stories", here are three gunpowder exclusives in the March issue of Vanity Fair: a friend of Ellen DeGeneres explains why she's so inspiring; Chuck Close, the "art-world legend", photographs Scarlett Johansson‎, George Clooney, Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts "in a gallery of revelation"; and "the truth about the close relationship" between Rupert Murdoch's ex-wife Wendi Deng and Tony Blair. The latter surely qualifies for "takedown" status, does it not?

Source: Vanity Fair

COMMENTS
Be the first to post a comment!


Post A Comment:




  • It's 2020! Start booking roles in commercials, fashion, films, theater and more with The Agency Online!

  • NEW WORKSHOP with Barbara Barna & Sean De Simone!

    Hi Everyone and Happy Summer! Sean at Sean De Simone casting and Barbara Barna are teaming up for a super informative and fun Hosting for Home Shopping workshop. A great opportunity for established or experienced TV Hosts and Experts interested in learning how to get noticed and how to get in....
  • MASTERCLASS W. Robin Carus & David John Madore

    A Special Offer for the Agency Community, from one of our favorite NYC Casting Directors! EMAIL FacetheMusicWithUs@gmail.com Or Eventbrite To Sign Up! Class Size is Limited.
  • Don't Fall Into The Comparison Trap

    Hi Everyone! As the second installment in an ongoing series of features by the Agency's amazing community, here's some sage advice from our own Regina Rockensies; a humble (& awesome)veteran we've had the pleasure of working with for a long time. Have an excellent week! : ) - The Agency....
  • One Model's Agreement

    Hi Everyone! As the first piece in an ongoing series of original articles by the Agency community, here's a short reflection on some of the values of professional acting & modeling that we can all keep in mind for our next casting. Good luck on your castings &shoots this week! : ) -....




 
home       castings&news       privacy policy       terms and conditions      contact us      browser tips
Official PayPal Seal