The Agency's Posts

David Letterman Retiring After 33 Years As Late Night Host: David Letterman is retiring in 2015 after 33 years as a late night host. Letterman announced....
Read More>

'Dom Hemingway' Review: Jude Law Shines: A temperamental, egotistical, British ex-con with a soft side for the daughter he left behind,....
Read More>

TV review: SURVIVING JACK: There is something both touching and irritating about Justin Halpern's dogged determination to....
Read More>

Sneak peek: The Rock becomes Hercules: "I was born to play this role," says the 6-foot-5 action star Sometimes special....
Read More>

Darren Aronofsky Calls 'Noah' The 'Least Biblical Film Ever Made': "Noah" director Darren Aronofsky and the movie's distributor, Paramount Pictures,....
Read More>

Pharrell Williams: 'My music is so much bigger than me, and what I am': Pharrell Williams wrote three of 2013's biggest tunes, and has made music with everyone from Daft....
Read More>

Iceland on film: a road trip around the 'Hollywood of the north': Another Day. Photograph: Snap Stills/Rex. Click on the magnifying glass to see Iceland's....
Read More>

Alec Baldwin and the fine art of becoming unfamous: The actor has become the latest celebrity to retire less than gracefully, joining Shia LaBeouf....
Read More>

Oscars Review: How Did Ellen DeGeneres Do As Host?: NEW YORK (AP) — With only a week to catch our breath after the lengthy cavalcade of....
Read More>

Oscars 2014: Gravity dominates, but 12 Years a Slave wins best film: Alfonso Cuarón's space thriller takes seven awards, but loses out to 12 Years a Slave....
Read More>

Seth Meyers and 'Late Night' premiere: Highest ratings in nine years: This "Late Night" thing might work out OK for Seth Meyers. The former "Weekend....
Read More>
You'd Be Shocked at What These Fashion Editors Are Editing Out of Their Photos
Posted on: 01/08/14
Share/Save/Bookmark
A former editor at Cosmopolitan, Leah Hardy, recently wrote an exposé about the practice of Photoshopping models to hide the health and aesthetic costs of extreme thinness. Below is an example featuring Cameron Diaz:



The story about Diaz, in The Telegraph, includes the following description of the image's manipulation:
  • Face: Cheeks appear filled out
  • Bust: Levelled
  • Thighs: Wider in the picture on the right
  • Hip: The bony definition has been smoothed away
  • Stomach: A fuller, more natural look
  • Arms: A bit more bulk in the arms and shoulders

Hardy, the editor at Cosmo, explains that she frequently re-touched models who were "frighteningly thin."  Others have reported similar practices. Jane Druker, the editor of Healthy magazine -- which is sold in health food stores -- admitted retouching a cover girl who pitched up at a shoot looking "really thin and unwell." The editor of the top-selling health and fitness magazine in the U.S., Self, has admitted: "We retouch to make the models look bigger and healthier."

And the editor of British Vogue, Alexandra Shulman, has quietly confessed to being appalled by some of the models on shoots for her own magazine, saying: "I have found myself saying to the photographers, 'Can you not make them look too thin?'"

Robin Derrick, creative director of Vogue, has admitted: "I spent the first ten years of my career making girls look thinner -- and the last ten making them look larger." Hardy described her position as a "dilemma" between offering healthy images and reproducing the mythology that extreme thinness is healthy:

At the time, when we pored over the raw images, creating the appearance of smooth flesh over protruding ribs, softening the look of collarbones that stuck out like coat hangers, adding curves to flat bottoms and cleavage to pigeon chests, we felt we were doing the right thing... We knew our readers would be repelled by these grotesquely skinny women, and we also felt they were bad role models and it would be irresponsible to show them as they really were.

But now, I wonder. Because for all our retouching, it was still clear to the reader that these women were very, very thin. But, hey, they still looked great!

They had 22-inch waists (those were never made bigger), but they also had breasts and great skin. They had teeny tiny ankles and thin thighs, but they still had luscious hair and full cheeks.

Thanks to retouching, our readers... never saw the horrible, hungry downside of skinny. That these underweight girls didn't look glamorous in the flesh. Their skeletal bodies, dull, thinning hair, spots and dark circles under their eyes were magicked away by technology, leaving only the allure of coltish limbs and Bambi eyes.

Insightfully, Hardy describes this as a "vision of perfection that simply didn't exist" and concludes, "[n]o wonder women yearn to be super-thin when they never see how ugly [super-]thin can be."

It's bad to police people's bodies, no matter whether they're thin or fat. This is an important point (made well here) and while I agree that some of the language is harsh, that's not what's going on here. The vast majority of the models who need reverse Photoshopping aren't women who just happen to have that body type. They are part of an social institution that demands extreme thinness and they're working hard on their bodies to be able to deliver it. This isn't, then, about shaming naturally thin women, it's about (1) calling out an industry that requires women to be unhealthy and then hides the harmful consequences and (2) acknowledging that even people who are a part of that industry don't necessarily have the power to change it.

A version of this post originally appeared on Sociological Images and Business Insider.

Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the principle writer for Sociological Images. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

 
 
 

Follow Lisa Wade on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lisawade


 









COMMENTS
drew writes:
this is what i have been saying all along! photos can be photo-shopped! which means they can be useless as far as acting goes! also you really get to know someone when you meet them! so photos should have little to do with getting parts in films! the problem is most directors and casting agents look at photos and overemphasize their value! actors need to be very patient and vigilant to overcome the stupidity (sorry!) of the people they are auditioning for! i am sure that won't make me popular with directors and casting agents but it may help some frustrated actors!
01/23/2014 5:20 am


Post A Comment:




  • It's 2020! Start booking roles in commercials, fashion, films, theater and more with The Agency Online!

  • NEW WORKSHOP with Barbara Barna & Sean De Simone!

    Hi Everyone and Happy Summer! Sean at Sean De Simone casting and Barbara Barna are teaming up for a super informative and fun Hosting for Home Shopping workshop. A great opportunity for established or experienced TV Hosts and Experts interested in learning how to get noticed and how to get in....
  • MASTERCLASS W. Robin Carus & David John Madore

    A Special Offer for the Agency Community, from one of our favorite NYC Casting Directors! EMAIL FacetheMusicWithUs@gmail.com Or Eventbrite To Sign Up! Class Size is Limited.
  • Don't Fall Into The Comparison Trap

    Hi Everyone! As the second installment in an ongoing series of features by the Agency's amazing community, here's some sage advice from our own Regina Rockensies; a humble (& awesome)veteran we've had the pleasure of working with for a long time. Have an excellent week! : ) - The Agency....
  • One Model's Agreement

    Hi Everyone! As the first piece in an ongoing series of original articles by the Agency community, here's a short reflection on some of the values of professional acting & modeling that we can all keep in mind for our next casting. Good luck on your castings &shoots this week! : ) -....




 
home       castings&news       privacy policy       terms and conditions      contact us      browser tips
Official PayPal Seal